During the hearing on August 20, Munukuntla’s lawyer presented a detailed list of her expenses, which included Rs 15,000 per month for shoes, dresses, and accessories, Rs 60,000 for food at home, and Rs 4-5 lakh for medical treatment related to knee pain and physiotherapy. The judge expressed disbelief at the high demands, questioning their necessity, especially since the woman had no family responsibilities.
In response, the judge remarked, “If she wants to spend, let her earn. Not on the husband.” The judge emphasized that Section 24 is not intended to punish a spouse in a matrimonial dispute by imposing unreasonable financial burdens. The court urged the lawyer to propose a more reasonable amount, warning that the plea could be dismissed if the demands were not revised.
The judge’s comments highlighted the court’s stance against extravagant demands in maintenance cases, underscoring that the provision is meant to cover basic necessities, not luxury expenses. A video of the judge’s remarks during the hearing has since gone viral on social media.
Under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, interim maintenance can be granted to a dependent spouse during ongoing legal proceedings if they lack sufficient independent income.